FundingPips Investigation Summary
Company response status: Very High Concern
1. Investigation Summary
Report type: Public Audit Report — V3 Response-Adjusted Methodology
Investigation status: Under Investigation — public replies reviewed; direct right to reply open.
Important Evidence Notice
This report is based on public review text supplied to PropFirm Evidence, complaint-pattern analysis, and public company reply material contained in the supplied review text. It is not a legal judgment, regulatory finding, court finding, or proof that any company did something wrong.
This report does not say Hola Prime is guilty, does not say every complaint is true, and does not tell the public what decision to make. A trader public claim and a company public reply are both treated as claims until supported by evidence.
Trust is not proven when everything goes well. Trust is proven by how a firm responds when something goes wrong.
Public Review Snapshot
PropFirm Evidence reviewed 311 unique public review entries for Hola Prime after visible duplicate removal. Of those, 181 entries were selected as High or Very High public concern complaint signals under the V3 methodology.
The current Public Complaint Safety Score is 18/100. The public category is Very High Concern, with Medium-Low evidence confidence.
Public replies were detected, mostly specific or disputed, but not independently evidenced within the supplied material.
Main Finding
The strongest public pattern is concentrated around decisions that affect money-stage outcomes or account continuation. This includes payout requests, funded or direct account continuation, profit removal or rebalance, account breach or closure, KYC/device/profile review, and post-funding rule interpretation.
The repeated rule pattern is especially concentrated around the 2% Risk Rule, stop-loss timing, same-trade-idea aggregation, margin utilisation, gambling or speculative classifications, tick scalping/HFT classifications, news trading, device sharing, and consistency-related disputes.
The evidence reviewed does not prove wrongdoing. However, the current, repeated, and high-impact nature of the public complaint pattern supports a Very High Concern public complaint safety score under V3.
Evidence Dataset Reviewed
| Raw public review excerpts supplied | 331 |
| Unique public review entries after visible duplicate removal | 311 |
| Star range reviewed | 1–3 stars |
| 1-star / 2-star / 3-star unique entries | 263 / 16 / 32 |
| Date range reviewed | 8 Oct 2024 – 28 Jul 2026 |
| High / Very High public concern cases | 181 |
| Excluded lower / medium / unclear / no-finding entries | 130 |
| Direct trader-submitted verified cases completed | 0 |
| Independently verified cases completed | 0 |
| Company public replies detected in supplied text | 299 unique entries; 172 of High / Very High entries |
Case Count Notice
The number 311 means unique public review entries reviewed after visible duplicate removal. It does not mean 311 verified cases.
The number 181 means serious public concern complaint signals selected for the public concern register under V3. It does not mean 181 proven failures.
The number 130 means lower, medium, unclear, weak, resolved, duplicate, or insufficient-detail entries excluded from the serious public warning. They remain counted for transparency.